The Guardian
topics

Earnings
Palm’s Struggles Will Handicap Its Ability To Ward Off Upcoming Competition

Palm’s poor performance was no surprise today since it sent out a warning last month that sales were falling way short of expectations.

But it’s not the company’s weak performance in Q3 that people should worry about. Cash-strapped Palm (NSDQ: PALM) will be busy conducting a turnaround over the next few months as its competitors rush into the market with guns blazing. Already, Palm’s launch on Verizon Wireless took a back-seat to the Motorola (NYSE: MOT) Droid as Verizon’s big device launch of the year. Closer to the end of the year, Palm will have to contend with Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) as it prepares to launch its flashy new operating system.

Release. | Webcast.

The problem:

As the company warned last month, sales of the Palm Pre Plus and Palm Pixi Plus at Verizon Wireless did not meet expectations. The company blamed most of the problems on not sufficiently training Verizon Wireless retail employees on the product, so that they could recommend it to customers visiting the store. In the past, Verizon has focused strongly on pushing BlackBerry devices and then became occupied for the Motorola Droid launch. But Palm’s CEO Jon Rubinstein said with the help of Verizon, their employees are currently going from store-to-store to get employees up to date, and that there’s anecdotal evidence that it is working. Palm won’t launch with AT&T (NYSE: T) until later this year.

Unsold inventory:

The big concern in the short-term is the company’s mounds of unsold phones. The company said it shipped 960,000 smartphone during the quarter, which was above analyst’s expectations, however, the company’s sell-through for the quarter remained a dismal 408,000 units, falling 29 percent compared the the previous quarter. With unsold inventory being a problem, the company will have to wait until carriers order more phones. In Q4, revenues could be as low as $150 million, more than less than what it made in Q3. Falling sales in Q4 will mean the company will burn cash, something it doesn’t have a lot of—especially when compared to Microsoft or Google’s handset partners, like Motorola, Samsung or HTC.

Cash Reserves:

The company would not estimate how much cash it will burn in the upcoming quarter, but during the company’s conference call today, an analyst guessed out loud that it could be as much as $200 million. The company said at the end of Q3 it had $592 million in cash and equivalents. Palm said it doesn’t not have any plans to raise additional money because it has enough until the business breaks even.

Lowering spending:

In response to the outlook, Palm said it is revising spending and plans to focus on sales and marketing and field training efforts and that Q4 operating expenses will be lower than Q3. One of the areas is advertising, where it will launch a new 30-second TV campaign during the first two weeks of March Madness, but after that, Rubinstein said they’ll shift to cheaper online advertising in social networks. Cutting expenses is likely the most important thing Palm can do at this time, but with deep-pocket competitors like Apple (NSDQ: AAPL), Google (NSDQ: GOOG) and Microsoft, in the market it will be hard to remain top of mind for consumers.

Q3 Results:

In the third quarter, Palm reported a net loss of $18.5 million, or 13 cents a share, on revenue of $349.9 million—exceeding its own revised forecasts. Last month, it warned that revenues could be as low as $285 to $310 million. However, that’s below analysts’ expectations of $424.7 million (before the warning was issued).

Mar 18, 2010 7:17 PM ET

Palm Pre Photo: Palm

Share

Posted In: Mobile, Money, Earnings, Companies, Palm, Verizon

  • Metro PCS, Leap and Boost all have their plusses.  Metro and Leap overlap in primarily two markets, share each others spectrum for free roaming and both were doing well and are even doing better in this economic downturn. 

    Boost's new $50 all you can eat plan is finally a huge success as well, after their failures with the IDEN all you can eat push to talk and their $50 unlimited plan with no features.  The best could be yet to come with Boost Mobile, yet since the new Boost plan is in its infancty and knowing that parent company Sprint often takes questionable directions, it is too early to tell how successful it will be.

    The main issue that I see at this point that may determine the success and/or failure of Boost is the dire economic state of Motorola that is the only manufacturer of Boost IDEN phones.  Even though IDEN is a bit dated, the fact that Motorola does not manufacture enough of a variety of Boost Mobile phones and that no other manufacturer produces Boost Mobile phones is a big red light, in my opinion.  Prospects that only have the option of one manufacturer and one that only offers Boost an average of 5 models, versus Metro and Leap that offer between 14-20 at any given time, still makes it a rough road ahead for Boost.  Should Motorola fail and go BK, not find a buyer or even find a buyer for Motorola's wireless division, Boost may still face some challenges that Metro and Leap most likely will not face.

    I'd put my "money" on Metro and Leap, in that order before I'd put all my "eggs in one basket" with Boost…

  • Tatum Hawkins from Boost Mobile here ...

    Just to clarify, Boost is not an MVNO, we are a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprint.  Also, our recently launched $50 'Monthly Unlimited' plan that includes nationwide talk, text, Web and walkie-talkie doesn't match the similar unlimited plans by MetroPCS and Cricket, it blows them out of the water.  Our plan offers the most value to consumers at a straightforward price point. 

    For example, MetroPCS's and Cricket's $45/mo unlimited plans really mean up to $53.50 and $62, respectively when you add on over-the-counter fees, roaming charges and telecom taxes. No one wants to pay more than an advertised price. With Boost, $50 means $50.

  • digital bear

    Have any of these firms broken out their estimates of subscribers per payment plan—it seems like you could back into their scenario planning for T-Mobile (or just realize that this economy is bringing out all the desperate tactics including proving out that they really don't need to charge what they do to make $$ but have a scalable technology platform.)

Unhealthily Obsessed With Mobile Content | mocoNews Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors