The Guardian
topics

Exclusive
Is FiLife Running On Borrowed Time?

Less than two months after talking up the turnaround at Dow Jones-IAC (NSDQ: IACI) personal finance JV FiLife, paidContent has learned the site’s continued existence is no certainty. It survived the multiple trimmings as Barry Diller cut back on IAC’s portfolio of emerging businesses, but the company is now exploring options that range from leaving it open to a sale or a full shut down. When Ezra Kucharz, president and GM for just over a year, left for CBS (NYSE: CBS) in January, both IAC and DJ credited him publicly with turning around the site and building it to the #4 personal finance site with 4.4 million unique visitors in December. Now both companies are declining comment about the site’s future.

One possibility for IAC could be selling its stake to Dow Jones (NYSE: NWS), which recently bought out SmartMoney partner Hearst. But that’s a well-established brand with an 800,000-circ magazine. Whether DJ would even want to own FiLife outright is unclear—as is whether a deal actually would involve much money. What FiLife does have—more traffic than SmartMoney.com, where personal finance is just one category, and a digital mentality. Is there a way to combine the two?

FiLife has had a bit of a tortured life from its beginning: taking more than a year to move from an idea to a blog, then taking so long to emerge from that status the plans appeared to be dormant. Dave Kansas, brought in from the Wall Street Journal to launch the site, was replaced by online vet Kucharz in late 2008. Adam Wiener, executive editor and VP-content was promoted to GM when Kucharz left, but not given the title of president.

It’s made strides on the editorial side. Just last month FastCompany picked it as the most innovative company in the finance area for using “a Q&A format with a host of social and game-like features to get Americans talking about money. More as warranted—and please feel free to e-mail me if you have details.

Related Stories
Mar 19, 2010 11:15 PM ET

Hourglass

Share

Posted In: Features, Exclusive, Media & Publishing, Online News, Companies, IAC, News Corp., Dow Jones

  • peggy

    I agree the methodology (and a survey of only 1,001 users) leaves a lot of open questions. However, it's realistic to assume that users who surf the mobile Web also use mobile search - early-adopters are by definition tech-savvy. If they do gravitate to brand name search engines, it indicates users don't see much diference between online and mobile search - yet. The message to operators (particularly in the U.S. who have tied up with white label search providers): Get the experience right and usage is likely to follow. Users do search. Granted we're far from cricial mass, but we'll get there because search is central to navigating and interfacing with all things digital. Branded search is popular because it delivers what it promises. But it's early days and there's no reason why mobile search must belong exclusively to the companies we know from the Internet. There are cool made-for-mobile search services from white label providers such as JumpTap, Medio and InfoSpace - and lots to look for in the pipeline from the likes of MCN and mobilePeople. It's going to be an exciting time - and the battle is only beginning.

  • JohnMchenry

    This stat is BS.  Kind of like this blog.

Unhealthily Obsessed With Mobile Content | mocoNews Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors