Sprint-Clearwire: First Reactions To JV Are Mixed: ‘Spaghetti-like Mess,’ Google, Intel ‘Good Signs’
A joint-venture deal between Sprint (NYSE: S) and Clearwire (NSDQ: CLWR) that includes investments of $3.2 billion coming from Intel (NSDQ: INTC), Comcast (NSDQ: CMCSA), Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Google (NSDQ: GOOG) and Bright House Networks, among others, may be announced as early as tomorrow. With information leaked early to the WSJ, there’s already a slew of opinions formulating on what this all means. Here’s a few:
SEE ALSO: BREAKING: Sprint Nextel And Clearwire To Announce A $12 Billion WiMax Joint Venture
—mocoNews: Our take is that this deal, which may not have closed yet, may actually work after a previous deal between Clearwire and Sprint Nextel failed and a deal between Sprint and the cable operators also failed. Why? They all need each other for one reason or another.
—GigaOm: “This is a spaghetti-like mess of conflicts and self-interests. I wonder how open this network is going to be? Clear has a history of blocking other services such as VoIP carriers. Comcast is a known P2P offender. Will Google be our only search option?”
—CNET News.com: “At this point it’s difficult to say whether the new WiMax joint venture will be a big success. The involvement of Google and Intel are good signs, but it remains to be seen if this network will ever have the legs it needs to compete against networks built by competitors using a technology with a greater following.” More after the jump.
—Silicon Valley Insider: “The big unknown: Who’s going to use Clear? The most obvious Clear subscribers are people who currently use slower, 3G laptop cards to connect to the Internet when they’re not in a wi-fi zone. More widespread adoption will take a while, as consumer electronics companies eventually build WiMax into a variety of cellphones and gadgets like portable videogame consoles, laptops, etc.”
—Julie Ask, analyst, Jupiter Research: “Google makes money from advertising - so more inventory at higher rates serves them well. Higher rates are plausible - if you add context (e.g., location) to search terms, you can charge more. Leading someone into the nearby auto dealership to buy a car is worth more than driving web traffic to gm.com. How much inventory can benefit from context including location? That’s an unknown, but likely a question Google can answer….competition for AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon?: “My first reaction is that I don’t believe they’ll feel threatened. The investments will certainly give Sprint a boost and make the likelihood of this network being built out higher. AT&T and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) are the market leaders in wireless as measured by number of subscribers - they are by definition less likely to take risks. Besides, they already have home (wired) + wireless plays….”
Posted In: Entertainment, Social Media, Technologies / Formats, 3G, Broadband, WiMax, Companies, AT&T, Clearwire, Google, Sprint, Verizon
Kindle (Paid)
Social Standing
Which media brands are getting a lift from Tweeters and bloggers right now -- and which are getting panned?
Show Me: